• 2008-10-29

    transcript

    版权声明:转载时请以超链接形式标明文章原始出处和作者信息及本声明
    http://ville.blogbus.com/logs/30753441.html

     

    TestTest DateReadingListeningSpeakingWritingTotal
    TELXMLOctober 12, 200828292328108
     
     
     
     
     
     

    Reading  SkillsLevel  Your Performance  
    ReadingHigh(22-30)

    Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities regardless of the difficulty of the texts.

    Test takers who score at the HIGH level, typically

    • have a very good command of academic vocabulary and grammatical structure;
    • can understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and synthesize ideas, even when the text is conceptually dense and the language is complex;
    • can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role that specific information serves within the larger text, even when the text is conceptually dense; and
    • can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is conceptually dense and contains complex language.
     
    Listening  SkillsLevel  Your Performance  
    ListeningHigh(22-30)

    Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information.

    When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at the HIGH level typically can

    • understand main ideas and important details, whether they are stated or implied;
    • distinguish more important ideas from less important ones;
    • understand how information is being used (for example, to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process);
    • recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);
    • understand many different ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and
    • synthesize information, even when it is not presented in sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.
     
    Speaking  SkillsLevel  Your Performance  
    Speaking about familiar topicsGood(3.5 - 4.0)

    Your responses indicate an ability to communicate your personal experiences and opinions effectively in English. Overall, your speech is clear and fluent. Your use of vocabulary and grammar is effective with only minor errors. Your ideas are generally well developed and expressed coherently.

     
    Speaking about campus situationsFair(2.5 - 3.0)

    Your responses demonstrate an ability to speak in English about reading material and experiences typically encountered by university students. You are able to convey relevant information about conversations, newspaper articles, and campus bulletins; however, some details are missing or inaccurate. Limitations of grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation at times cause difficulty for the listener. However, they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.

     
    Speaking about academic course contentFair(2.5 - 3.0)

    Your responses demonstrate that you are able to speak in English about academic reading and lecture material, with only minor communication problems. For the most part, your speech is clear and easy to understand. However, some problems with pronunciation and intonation may occasionally cause difficulty for the listener. Your use of grammar and vocabulary is adequate to talk about the topics, but some ideas are not fully developed or are inaccurate.

     
    Writing  SkillsLevel  Your Performance  
    Writing based on reading and listeningGood(4.0 - 5.0)

    You responded well to the task, relating the lecture to the reading. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with

    • slight imprecision in your summary of some of the main points and/or
    • use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical or unclear.
     
    Writing based on knowledge and experienceGood(4.0 - 5.0)

    You responded with a well-organized and developed essay. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with

    • use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical, unclear, or unidiomatic and/or
    • elaboration of ideas or connection of ideas that could have been stronger.
     

      


    随机文章:

    2009-01-01 2009-01-01
    haha 2008-03-13
    2007-09-02 2007-09-02
    乐园生活 2007-05-07
    carcass 2007-03-15

    收藏到:Del.icio.us




    评论

  • 好吧~俺被打击了~
    我只要100就好~泪奔~
  • 牛啊牛~